一部主流级别的电脑,其核心当然是一个主流级别的处理器。而Intel 酷睿i5-9400F以及AMD 锐龙5 3500X可以说是目前比较热门的主流级别处理器了。那么,如果要选择的话,这两款处理器哪款更加适合后期制作呢?今天我们一起来看看Intel 酷睿i5-9400F和AMD 锐龙5 3500X在Photoshop和Lightroom中处理后期制作的表现。
预览var tableid = settableid();
document.write('');
Table().init({
title: "处理器规格",
header: ["型号", "核心/线程", "最大/基础频率", "L3缓存", "DDR4", "核显", "TDP", "售价"],
width: '91%',
columnWidth: 'AUTO', //表格宽度,"AVG"平均,"AUTO"自动(默认),指定[15,16,20]
id: tableid,
data: [
["Intel 酷睿i5-9400F", "6/6", "4.1/2.9 GHz", "9MB","2666MHz","N/A","65W","¥1199"],
["AMD 锐龙5 3500X", "6/6", "4.1/3.6GHz", "32MB","3200MHz","N/A","65W","¥1009"],
]
});首先我们来看它们各自的规格。6核6线程的AMD 锐龙5 3500X基础频率为3.6
GHz,加部频率为4.1
GHz,其L3缓存分别为32
MB,TDP为65瓦,最高支持3200
MHz的DDR4内存。
至于TDP为65瓦的Intel 酷睿i5-9400F同样也为6核6线程,基础频率要比AMD 锐龙5 3500X要低一点为2.9
GHz,不过加速频率则是同为4.1GHz。对于内存的支持也比AMD 锐龙5 3500X稍为低一点,最高只支持2666
MHz的内存,L3缓存也较低,为9
MB。
两者的规格都比较接近,定位也一样,不过AMD 锐龙5 3500X的价格目前为1009元,而Intel 酷睿i5-9400F则为1199元,后者比前者贵了190元。
测试平台var tableid = settableid();
document.write('');
Table().init({
align: 'left',
width: '80%',
padding: '8px 15px',
header: ["测 试 平 台"],
id: tableid,
data: [
["硬件平台"],
["CPU ", "AMD 锐龙5 3500X","Intel 酷睿i5-9400F"],
["主板", "微星 B450M 钛金版迫击炮","技嘉 B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI"],
["显卡", "讯景 RX 5700 XT 海外双风扇版", ],
["内存", "XPG 龙耀 D80 DDR4 3200MHz CL17 8GB","XPG 龙耀 D80 DDR4 2666MHz CL17 8GB", ],
["硬盘", "浦科特 M8SeY 512GB", ],
["散热器", "采融 ARTISTS 3", ],
["电源", "先马 金牌500W全模块电源", ],
["软件配置"],
["操作系统", "Microsoft Windows 10 64-bit 1909", ],
["驱动", "Adrenalin 2020 Edition 20.1.1", ]
]
});因为这次的目标是主流定位的电脑,因此笔者也是用了两套比较主流配置的平台。Intel这边是用了技嘉的B360
AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI主板、32
GB的XPG龙耀D80
DDR4 3600 MHz内存(降频至2666
MHz)、浦科特M8SeY
512GB SSD、讯景RX 5700 XT 海外双风扇版显卡以及采融ARTISTS 3散热器,电源则是先马的金牌500W全模块电源。
而AMD这边的平台则是除了主板换成了微星B450M
钛金版迫击炮外,其他的硬件都是一样的。由于AMD 锐龙5 3500X支持最高3200
MHz的内存,因此在内存频率上面也是调成了3200
MHz。
由于这次是针对对摄影师后期制作的测试,因此会用修图常用的Photoshop以及Lightroom来进行测试。至于测试方法,有别于以往单纯的测试导入导出,这次也会加入其他后期制作会用到的功能作测试,确保测试更加接近实际应用的情况。
这次的测试将会用Pugets
Systems的Lightroom及Photoshop测试,分别为《PugetBench
for Lightroom Classic》以及《PugetBench
for Photoshop》。在Lightroom的测试中,会测试预览图片、合并图片、污点去除笔刷延迟、白平衡调整、图库切换到修改图片、建立智能预览等的项目。而在Photoshop中,将会测试旋转、智能选取、镜头校正、锐代、降噪、虚化、合并图片等的项目。
Lightroom测试首先我们来看看Lightroom的成绩。由于Lightroom主要是用作图片批量处理,因此是以批量图片来测试的,测试项目也是较为常用的。测试是以不同项目来测试3组不同像素的相片。
预览var title_text = "Lightroom总分"; // 标题文字热管
var subtitle_text = "Higher is better "; // 副标题文字
var unit_text = "分 "; //单位
var leftside = "12%"; //左边空白
var topside = 50; //每组间距
var mblur = 0.05; //模糊效果
var bgopacity = 0; //背景透明度,0为全透明
var mysort = 0; //是否排序
var myper = 1; //是否显示百分比
var mylengend = true; //是否显示图例
var toplegend = 50; //图例上端空白
var labelcolor = '#fff'; // 标签文字颜色
var legendwidth = '90%'; //图例宽度
var titlecolor = '#222'; //标题文字颜色
var barheight = 35; //柱高度
var bargap = 3; //柱间距,相当于百分值,即2%
var autocolor = 1; //是否自动判断颜色,0为否,1根据品牌生成颜色 ,如果 >1 则为均AMD NV Intel 标准色,
var mycolor = []; //自动生成随机颜色 也可ANIColor("NVIDIA",3)可以生成三种NV绿
//var mycolor = ANIColor('AMD',4); //这样自动生成4种AMD红色,其它如NVIDIA、Intel同理
//var mycolor=['#953f61', '#72355f', '#d77169']; //自定义颜色 AMD红 '#9F1417', NV绿 '#82B41B', Intel蓝 '#0075C5',
//var mycolor = ['#0dcc47', '#969696', '#6f7b80','5A94DF'];
var data_arr = [{
"type": "Overall Score",
"Intel 酷睿i5-9400F": "688",
"AMD 锐龙5 3500X": "799.5"
},{
"type": "Active Tasks Score",
"Intel 酷睿i5-9400F": "74.2",
"AMD 锐龙5 3500X": "82.6"
},{
"type": "Passive Task Score",
"Intel 酷睿i5-9400F": "63.4",
"AMD 锐龙5 3500X": "77.3"
}];
TDInit(title_text, subtitle_text, unit_text, leftside, topside, mblur, bgopacity, mysort, myper, mylengend, toplegend, labelcolor, legendwidth, titlecolor, barheight, bargap, mycolor, data_arr, autocolor);预览var tableid = settableid();
document.write('');
Table().init({
title: "Lightroom测试各项目耗时对比(秒)",
header: ["图片格式","22MP.CR2","","42MP.ARW","","45MP.NEF","","AMD 锐龙5 3500X领先幅度"],
width: '91%',
columnWidth: 'AUTO', //表格宽度,"AVG"平均,"AUTO"自动(默认),指定[15,16,20]
id: tableid,
data: [
["CPU","Intel 酷睿i5-9400F","AMD 锐龙5 3500X","Intel 酷睿i5-9400F","AMD 锐龙5 3500X","Intel 酷睿i5-9400F","AMD 锐龙5 3500X","差距"],
["导入500张图片","7.66","6.68","12","10.76","10.84","7.02","19.80%"],
["图库缩放浏览","0.92","0.9","0.94","0.9","0.94","0.92","2.86%"],
["修正图片缩放浏览","1.04","1.04","1.82","1.71","1.14","1.13","3.00%"],
["图库切换至修正图片","1.31","1.33","1.94","1.82","1.45","1.41","2.98%"],
["修正图片自动白平衡","0.68","0.54","1.07","0.91","0.8","0.7","15.69%"],
["修正图片笔刷延迟","0.2","0.15","0.2","0.15","0.3","0.2","28.57%"],
["建立500张图片智能预览","200.55","198.07","242.13","240.21","196.08","195.4","0.80%"],
["全境图片合并","50.32","28.89","52.51","36.25","84.47","45.98","40.67%"],
["HDR图片合并","21.77","18.45","21.31","19","34.65","29.49","13.88%"],
["以JPEG导出50张图片","59.46","45.56","132.98","97.67","113.35","80.79","26.74%"],
["转换50张图片至DNG","38.84","37.96","51.09","46.24","51.41","51.42","4.05%"],
["平均幅度","","","","","","","14.46%"]
]
});在Lightroom测试中,AMD 锐龙5 3500X整体上以百分之14左右的优势领先于Intel 酷睿i5-9400F,其中合并图片以及修正图片笔刷延迟的成绩差异最大。
在合并4500万像素的NEF格式图片时,AMD 锐龙5 3500X以接近39秒的差距大幅度领先Intel 酷睿i5-9400F,其余两组图片的结果也是AMD 锐龙5 3500X领先不少。而综合3种图片格式的全境图片合并时间下来,AMD 锐龙5 3500X要比Intel 酷睿i5-9400F要比快百分之40左右,差距可以说是比较大了。
而在导出测试方面,在2200万像素图片的测试中,Intel 酷睿i5-9400F要落后于AMD 锐龙5 3500X大概14秒左右,而其余两组图片的差距换算成百分比也是差不多,不过因为耗时较长,所以用户更能感觉到差别。
而从图库切换至修正图片这个项目是唯一一个Intel 酷睿i5-9400F胜出的项目。在导入的图片为2200万像素图片时,Intel 酷睿i5-9400F的切换时间比AMD
锐龙5 3500X要快上0.02秒,不过笔者有一点怀疑这0.02秒的差别用户会不会用得出来。
Photoshop测试Photoshop相对于Lightroom更加适用于对单张图片进行更加精细的修整,其功能比较多,因此测试的项目也更多一点。
预览var title_text = "Photoshop总分"; // 标题文字热管
var subtitle_text = "Higher is better "; // 副标题文字
var unit_text = "分"; //单位
var leftside = "8%"; //左边空白
var topside = 50; //每组间距
var mblur = 0.05; //模糊效果
var bgopacity = 0; //背景透明度,0为全透明
var mysort = 0; //是否排序
var myper = 1; //是否显示百分比
var mylengend = true; //是否显示图例
var toplegend = 50; //图例上端空白
var labelcolor = '#fff'; // 标签文字颜色
var legendwidth = '90%'; //图例宽度
var titlecolor = '#222'; //标题文字颜色
var barheight = 35; //柱高度
var bargap = 3; //柱间距,相当于百分值,即2%
var autocolor = 1; //是否自动判断颜色,0为否,1根据品牌生成颜色 ,如果 >1 则为均AMD NV Intel 标准色,
var mycolor = []; //自动生成随机颜色 也可ANIColor("NVIDIA",3)可以生成三种NV绿
//var mycolor = ANIColor('AMD',4); //这样自动生成4种AMD红色,其它如NVIDIA、Intel同理
//var mycolor=['#953f61', '#72355f', '#d77169']; //自定义颜色 AMD红 '#9F1417', NV绿 '#82B41B', Intel蓝 '#0075C5',
//var mycolor = ['#0dcc47', '#969696', '#6f7b80','5A94DF'];
var data_arr = [{
"type": "Overall Score",
"Intel 酷睿i5-9400F": "727.8",
"AMD 锐龙5 3500X": "819"
}, {
"type": "GPU Score",
"Intel 酷睿i5-9400F": "85.4",
"AMD 锐龙5 3500X": "87.2"
},{
"type": "General Score",
"Intel 酷睿i5-9400F": "78.1",
"AMD 锐龙5 3500X": "87.9"
},{
"type": "Filter Score",
"Intel 酷睿i5-9400F": "61.5",
"AMD 锐龙5 3500X": "70"
},{
"type": "Photomerge Score",
"Intel 酷睿i5-9400F": "84.7",
"AMD 锐龙5 3500X": "93.7"
},];
TDInit(title_text, subtitle_text, unit_text, leftside, topside, mblur, bgopacity, mysort, myper, mylengend, toplegend, labelcolor, legendwidth, titlecolor, barheight, bargap, mycolor, data_arr, autocolor);预览var tableid = settableid();
document.write('');
Table().init({
title: "Photoshop测试各项目耗时对比(秒)",
header: ["CPU","Intel 酷睿i5-9400F","AMD 锐龙5 3500X","AMD 锐龙5 3500X领先幅度"],
width: '80%',
columnWidth: 'AUTO', //表格宽度,"AVG"平均,"AUTO"自动(默认),指定[15,16,20]
id: tableid,
data: [
["开启RAW档案","1.32","1.16","12.12%"],
["重设大小为500MB","2.91","2.85","2.06%"],
["旋转","2.55","2.34","8.24%"],
["魔术棒选取","17.25","11.24","34.84%"],
["蒙版精确度","4.32","4.01","7.18%"],
["油漆桶","2.8","1.86","33.57%"],
["渐变","0.66","0.65","1.52%"],
["内容感知填充","7.81","7.68","1.66%"],
["保存PSD档案","112.27","111.49","0.69%"],
["开启PSD档案","14.6","14.88","-1.92%"],
["Camera Raw滤镜","7.79","7.32","6.03%"],
["镜头校正","24.67","19.18","22.25%"],
["降噪","30.97","25.02","19.21%"],
["智能锐化","24.81","20.93","15.64%"],
["背景模糊","15.83","14.64","7.52%"],
["移轴模糊","16.16","14.91","7.74%"],
["光圈模拟","18.22","16.88","7.35%"],
["修正球面变型","62.88","47.17","24.98%"],
["液化","5.83","5.5","5.660%"],
["2200万像素图片合并","82.07","76.42","6.88%"],
["4500万像素图片合并","109.6","96.33","12.11%"],
["平均幅度","","","11.21%"]
]
});在Photoshop测试中,可以看到AMD 锐龙5 3500X 的整体得分比起Intel 酷睿i5-9400F要高出大概百分之11左右,其中,油漆桶以及魔术棒选取的差距是最大。在这两个项目中,AMD 锐龙5 3500X要比Intel 酷睿i5-9400F要比快上百分之33以及34左右,特别是在魔术棒选取中,AMD 锐龙5 3500X成绩为11秒左右,而Intel 酷睿i5-9400F则是需时17秒左右,这样的差距可以说是非常明显的差异了,在实际使用时用户也会感觉到明显的速度差别。
至于其他项目,差距则是在百分之不足百分之1至百分之24左右。当中,保存PSD档案的差距为百分之0.7,而修正球面变型的差距为百分之25。不过,在开启PSD档案这个项目中,AMD
锐龙5 3500X以0.22秒的速度不敌Intel 酷睿i5-9400F。
而在耗时最长的图片合并测试中,AMD 锐龙5 3500X分别以百分之7以及百分之12的差距取胜。这种需时较长的工作也是用户最明显能够感知到时间差别的,因此相差了6秒和13秒对于体验上来说是比较巨大的。
游戏测试那么,我们也不能够排除掉摄影师忙完了一天的工作之后会想打游戏来放松一下的可能性,因此笔者也把三款游戏的跑分成绩加入了进来。所有游戏画质选项均设置为最高/极高/Ultra最佳来进行测试。
预览var title_text = "游戏对比"; // 标题文字热管
var subtitle_text = "www.expreview.com | Higher is better "; // 副标题文字
var unit_text = "fps "; //单位
var leftside = "8%"; //左边空白
var topside = 50; //每组间距
var mblur = 0.05; //模糊效果
var bgopacity = 0; //背景透明度,0为全透明
var mysort = 0; //是否排序
var myper = 1; //是否显示百分比
var mylengend = true; //是否显示图例
var toplegend = 50; //图例上端空白
var labelcolor = '#fff'; // 标签文字颜色
var legendwidth = '90%'; //图例宽度
var titlecolor = '#222'; //标题文字颜色
var barheight = 35; //柱高度
var bargap = 3; //柱间距,相当于百分值,即2%
var autocolor = 1; //是否自动判断颜色,0为否,1根据品牌生成颜色 ,如果 >1 则为均AMD NV Intel 标准色,
var mycolor = []; //自动生成随机颜色 也可ANIColor("NVIDIA",3)可以生成三种NV绿
//var mycolor = ANIColor('AMD',4); //这样自动生成4种AMD红色,其它如NVIDIA、Intel同理
//var mycolor=['#953f61', '#72355f', '#d77169']; //自定义颜色 AMD红 '#9F1417', NV绿 '#82B41B', Intel蓝 '#0075C5',
//var mycolor = ['#0dcc47', '#969696', '#6f7b80','5A94DF'];
var data_arr = [{
"type": "剌客信条:奥德赛",
"Intel 酷睿i5-9400F": "58.5",
"AMD 锐龙5 3500X": "63.2"
}, {
"type": "战争机器5",
"Intel 酷睿i5-9400F": "113.9",
"AMD 锐龙5 3500X": "112.8"
}, {
"type": "地铁:离去",
"Intel 酷睿i5-9400F": "63.0",
"AMD 锐龙5 3500X": "63.6"
}];
TDInit(title_text, subtitle_text, unit_text, leftside, topside, mblur, bgopacity, mysort, myper, mylengend, toplegend, labelcolor, legendwidth, titlecolor, barheight, bargap, mycolor, data_arr, autocolor);可以看到,AMD 锐龙5 3500X和Intel 酷睿i5-9400F在游戏方面可以说是比较接近的。在《刺客信条:奥德赛》中,可以看到AMD 锐龙5 3500X在平均帧数表现比Intel 酷睿i5-9400F好,这意味着前者不但会更为流畅,并且整体上卡顿会比后者少。
在《战争机器5》中AMD 锐龙5 3500X的帧数比起Intel 酷睿i5-9400F低了1帧左右,但这个换算下来是百分之0.0097的差值,在不足百分之1的情况下可以认为是误差。而当来到了新一代硬件杀手《地铁: 离去》时,AMD 锐龙5 3500X 和Intel 酷睿i5-9400F的表现也是比较相近。整体上来说AMD 锐龙5 3500X在游戏方面要比Intel 酷睿i5-9400F好一点,可以给予用户一个更加流畅的游戏体验。
总结Intel 酷睿i5-9400F与AMD 锐龙5 3500X一样同为6核6线程的处理器,其定位也是一样面向主流级别的用户。但是通过测试可以看出来,对于摄影师来说,AMD
锐龙5 3500X会更加适合他们后期修图的需求
不论是从Photoshop或者是Lightroom的测试结果来说,AMD 锐龙5 3500X的确是会表现得比Intel 酷睿i5-9400F要好,领先幅度从百分之1到百分之40都有,而那些耗时比较久的项目往往都是属于领先幅度较大的。
至于游戏方面的性能,AMD 锐龙5 3500X比起Intel 酷睿i5-9400F要稍为好一点,而且帧数方面会更加稳定,如果摄影师闲时想娱乐一下也是没有问题的。
目前的AMD 锐龙5 3500X的售价为1009元,比起Intel 酷睿i5-9400F便宜接近两百块。对于主机预算不多的摄影师来说,能省下两百块用于未来的摄影设备升级也是一件好事。